HTML5 vs Apps – HTML5 may be winning the war against apps
Here are a few stories that caught my attention in the publishing space this week:
The shortest link between content and revenue may be HTML5
A couple weeks ago, MIT Technology Review’s editor in chief and publisher Jason Pontin wrote a piece about killing their app and optimizing their website for all devices with HTML5. That same week, Lonely Planet’s Jani Patokallio predicted that HTML5 would nudge out the various ebook formats. This week, Wired publisher Howard Mittman shot back in an interview with Jeff John Roberts at PaidContent, insisting that apps are the future, not HTML5.
Roberts reports that “[Mittman] believes that HTML5 will just be part of a ‘larger app experience’ in which an app is a storefront or gateway for readers to have deeper interactions with publishing brands.” I’m not sure, however, that readers need yet another gateway (read: obstacle) to their content, and recent movements in the publishing industry suggest HTML5 may be the more likely way forward.
This week, Inkling founder and CEO Matt MacInnis announced the launch of Inkling for Web, an HTML5-based web client that brings Inkling’s iPad app features to any device with a browser. The app and HTML5 technology in this case are intertwined — all content previously owned in the app can now also be accessed via the web, and activity will sync between the app and the web, so notes made on the web will appear in the iPad app and vice versa. MacInnis says in the announcement that the launch is a big part of the company’s overall vision to provide service to anyone on any device they choose, one of the major benefits of choosing HTML5 technology.
Also this week, OverDrive announced plans to launch OverDrive Read, an open standard HTML5/EPUB browser-based ebook platform that will allow users to read ebooks online or offline, without having to install software or download an app. Dianna Dilworth at GalleyCat reports on additional benefits for publishers: “Using the platform, publishers can create a URL for each title. This link can include book previews and review copies, as well as browsing capabilities and sample chapters.”
In the end, it will all come down to what it always comes down to: money. Roger McNamee’s latest piece, “HTML 5: The Next Big Thing for Content,” takes a very thorough look at HTML5 in general and specifically in relation to content publishing (this week’s must-read). As to money, this excerpt stood out:
As it becomes more and more likely that ads will be incorporated as a revenue stream in ebooks, publishers will embrace whatever technology draws the shortest line and the most avenues between content and revenue, which at this point is looking more and more like HTML5.
MIT students present news reporting solutions
MIT Media Lab students were busy this week presenting final projects for their “News in the Age of Participatory Media” class. Andrew Phelps at Nieman Journalism Lab highlighted a few of the interesting projects, which were required to address a new tool, technique, or technology for reporting the news. One student proposed modernizing the hyperlink by attaching semantic meaning to it; another suggested a Wiki-like idea for correlations to put impossibly big numbers — the $15 trillion U.S. national debt, for instance — into context for readers.
The growing importance of data journalism makes another student’s suite of tools called DBTruck particularly interesting. As Phelps explains, users can “[e]nter the URL of a CSV file, JSON data, or an HTML table and DBTruck will clean up the data and import it to a local database.” The tools also let you compare arbitrary data to provoke deeper insights — in testing, the student discovered a correlation between low birth weights and New York state communities with high teen pregnancy rates, a connection that might not have been otherwise discovered.
Penguin and Macmillan deny participation in an illegal conspiracy
Publishers Penguin and Macmillan responded this week to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust lawsuitfiled earlier this year against the two publishers and Apple (Apple responded to the lawsuit last week). The New York Times reports that in Penguin’s 74-page response (PDF), it “called Amazon ‘predatory’ and a ‘monopolist’ that treats books as ‘widgets.’ It asserted that Amazon, not Penguin, was the company engaging in anticompetitive behavior, to the detriment of the industry.”
Laura Hazard Owen called Macmillan’s 26-page response (PDF) “shorter and more fiery” than Penguin’s. She reports:
Source : oreilly.com